Kare, Thanks for the suggestion. I also had thought of using the clamd socket interface, but won't do that unless there is no other way.
HAVP is running here on a minimal 2-core Athlon II (3.1 GHz) and HAVP by itself comprises over 10 processes. Given this configuration, I fear that using the socket interface instead of the direct libclamav interface would reduce HTTP throughput noticeably. Paul P.S. Would the clamd socket allow HAVP to do the "cut through" scanning that it does when "mandatory locking" is possible? > I saw this discussion about failing havp with ClamAV 0.98.4 and we > also use havp in our project for a long time. > There is a way to get havp working, until an other solution has been > found. > > Go to havp.config and disable clamlib and enabel the socket mode > ENABLECLAMLIB false > > ENABLECLAMD true > CLAMDSOCKET /var/log/clamd.socket > > I planned to contact the developer on weekend _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
