I've tried to change the value of "MaxRecursion" in clamd.conf to 4 and 44 respectively, but both experiments yield the same result.
Can it be a problem with the MTA ? On 20/05/2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > On 20.05.14 16:22, anctop wrote: >>Both clamav-milter & clamd were still working after the "attack" by the >> scan. >> >>Our config files assume default values for recursive scanning. >>I'd like to know if the recursion depth is lowered, will clamd fail to >>detect those viruses deeply hidden in nested directories ? > > Well, no idea. The scanning will finish with exit code indicating that it > was not able to scan the whole structure. > > There used to be ArchiveBlockMax option that instructed clamav to report > infection (with pseudo virus name) but it was removed and I don't see the > replacement for it. > > I also don't see how should clamav-milter behave here. > > Maybe I should try to test scanning archive of 16 nested directories to see > the results... > > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > I intend to live forever - so far so good. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
