Hi Alain, That was exactly what I was looking for. The idea of doing that was not sitting right with me. I will find another way to handle this file that will keep coming back from git when I do pulls.
Thank you, -Bill On 05/09/2014 02:48 PM, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 14:17 -0400, Bill Bennert wrote: >> Hi Alain, >> I greatly appreciate your time in confirming this. In response, I did >> some additional research and understand that it is a true positive since >> the file runs a test for that exact condition. Would white-listing it >> using a file signature hash be valid measure, or would that a bad idea? >> This is the first time I've encountered a true positive on a file I >> would normally keep and want to make sure I handle it appropriately. > Why would you do this in the first place. You are unquestionably > guaranteeing a True-Positive to get through. That could be exploited... > or not. > > Just make sure you realize what you are doing, not having blinders on. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
