On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:37 AM, Paul Whelan <paul...@blakecomp.co.uk> wrote: > On 30 Sep 2013 at 11:03, Martin Hepworth wrote: > >> Thanks >> was looking at the PUA page on the main www site and it's still got >> the 2007 advice of "here be monsters tread carefully" ;-) > > I use them but Alain Zidouemba from Sourcefire replied to a question in March > 2013 about a > PUA type that didn't fall into one of the categories saying: > >> As for what PUA category it comes under, I suppose you are referring to >> the old PUA categories we used to have. We are in the process of >> streamlining our signatures names (we will have an announcement soon). >> This "PUA" alert doesn't fall under any of the old PUA categories. > > I haven't heard anything since about that issue or any 'renaming' so perhaps > there are > changes still to come.
Thanks Paul, I’ll see if we can’t get a blog post up describing our naming conventions, etc. -- Joel Esler Senior Research Engineer, VRT OpenSource Community Manager Sourcefire _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
