> OK, we've been able to reproduce the problem and it is, as you all > suspected revolving around the www. matching. I've asked one of the > developers to look at it, and we should be able to provide some > best-practice guidelines on how to construct rules to avoid this > situation.
Thanks Matt, glad you'd spotted an issue too. > We'll also review if code changes are appropriate, but given how the tree > operates, I don't immediately expect that to be the case. Out of interest are there any "roadmaps"/future improvements for ClamAV that are being discussed, as the last changelog update was May (before the takeover)? Cheers, Steve Sanesecurity _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
