On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Paul Whelan <paul...@blakecomp.co.uk> wrote: > > On 9 Apr 2013 at 11:12, Steve Basford wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Couple of updates.. >> >> I've just check end the Sanesecurity.TestSig.GTUBE signature name had >> accidentally been renamed to Sanesecurity.TestSig.10616 >> >> I have, however, removed the checks for GTUBE, so at least ClamAV and >> Third-Party sigs are now consistent. > > Given that a large proportion of the Sanesecurity sigs detect spam, phishing, > and other junk > mail (and folks use them as such), wouldn't it be useful to include a > standard spam test > signature by default?
It seems to be very controversial if ClamAV should include signatures for other things than classic malware. Why not have some kind of classification of the signatures and let us control what we download via Freshclam? /peter _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
