Thanks for the report Mark. Bytecode 174 and later fixes the problem.
Please update your signatures. If any of you can share the samples that
were falsely detected as BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_1865, please send them in at
http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/sendvirus/ .

Thanks!

- Alain

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Mark G Thomas <m...@misty.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm also getting hits on BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_0165 today, which I
> believe are false positives.
>
> Mark
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 05:14:13PM +0100, Cedric Knight wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm seeing BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_0184 hit a wide variety of attachments as
> > of 14:40 UTC this afternoon.  Will submit a sample the usual way, but
> > wanted to warn that it just seems to be quite extensive.   (also
> > possibly BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_0165).
> >
> > Anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > --
> > All best wishes,
> >
> > Cedric Knight
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
> > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
>
> --
> Mark G. Thomas (m...@misty.com)
> Web: http://mgtinternet.com/
> Tel: +1-215-512-0112 US: 877-512-0112
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
> http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
>
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to