Thanks for the report Mark. Bytecode 174 and later fixes the problem. Please update your signatures. If any of you can share the samples that were falsely detected as BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_1865, please send them in at http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/sendvirus/ .
Thanks! - Alain On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Mark G Thomas <m...@misty.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm also getting hits on BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_0165 today, which I > believe are false positives. > > Mark > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 05:14:13PM +0100, Cedric Knight wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm seeing BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_0184 hit a wide variety of attachments as > > of 14:40 UTC this afternoon. Will submit a sample the usual way, but > > wanted to warn that it just seems to be quite extensive. (also > > possibly BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_0165). > > > > Anyone else seeing this? > > > > -- > > All best wishes, > > > > Cedric Knight > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml > > -- > Mark G. Thomas (m...@misty.com) > Web: http://mgtinternet.com/ > Tel: +1-215-512-0112 US: 877-512-0112 > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml > _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml