On 6/29/11 10:32 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
Can you ask him to attach gdb to it?
Or to run gcore<pid>?
That way we could get a stacktrace and have some idea on where the bug is.
Best regards,
--Edwin
___________
already did.
we, who appreciate all the work the clamav team does for us will always
do what we can (as long as it doesn't impact users TOO much!)
ps, 0.97 vs 0.97.1.. one other thing. as 0.97 ran, for a while, it went
from using 250Mb to over a gb in ram as it ran. 0.97.1 didn't run long
enough to see, but I will keep an eye on it with this patch.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNORT Integrator
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
