* aCaB wrote: > On 04/17/11 05:05, Dennis Peterson wrote: >> Adding the hard-coded UNOFFICIAL reduces some liability from the Clamav >> team. >
Which is why it shouldn't be changed in the underlying libclamav. > That! And lots of daily annoyances with FP reports too. > > Which is why the suffix won't go away Agree with you there. > nor an option will be available to get rid of it. > At least not from the ClamAV Team. Lets all say WONTFIX. :-) Seriously, quit trying to tell me what I can and can't do with your open source software. I agree with your why. "We don't want to make it easy for users to shoot themselves in the foot, then blame us." I do not agree with your what. "We won't make it easy for users to shoot themselves in the foot." Like bug 1754 fixes, an option for this will be available as an open source patch set to your open source software. At least two of your users want this feature. I speak for five Clamav installations, I don't know how many the other guy has. Also, what I have learned about Clamav in the last 24 hours while chasing this feature makes the effort worth it. I've gotten more out of the experience than I've put in yet. You can bet I'm going to finish this. -- Sincerely, Nathan Gibbs Systems Administrator Christ Media http://www.cmpublishers.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
