On 2/28/11 7:30 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
Maybe we should tag all our new signatures with 0.96.4+ (ldb, bytecode, and ndb at least)? Of course that means that 0.95 would be even less effective at detecting malware than it already is (no VI/IDB/CBC support there), but apparently people running 0.95 care more about clamd "working" than actually detecting malware.
http://inetnw.net/cgi-bin/virus/vdisplay.pl See a pattern? dp _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
