On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 21:26 -0700, Jim Preston wrote: > > On 02/11/2011 12:59 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > On 2/11/2011 2:17 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > >> We have a strong preference to running only RHEL5+EPEL packages, > >> so we're kind of stuck on 0.95.1 until EPEL updates or we move to > >> RHEL6+EPEL which gives us clamav-0.96.1. I expect you will have quite > >> a few users with the same/similar policy... > > FWIW, rpmforge has clamav-0.96.5 at the moment. Personally, I would > > swap repos if epel is going to take over 1.5 years (!) to update an > > antivirus package. > > > And if you are paying for support or RHEL5, I would start bitching > loudly to RH. It should not take long for a junior engineer to run the > system through it's paces to validate clamav. Your license and support > should be worth something, just MHO. > Aren't you completely missing the point of a Release, where functionality is frozen, only security fixes are implemented?
Just my $0.02, Steve -- Steve Holdoway <st...@greengecko.co.nz> http://www.greengecko.co.nz MSN: st...@greengecko.co.nz Skype: sholdowa _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
