On 2011 Feb 11, at 13:54 , Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> For us it took down clamd on 15 servers at 00:03 today, and
> we received the fix 3 hours later... but clamd wasn't restarter
> before later this morning, leading to huge mailqueues.
> 
> We should probably look into verifying the db before telling
> clamd to reload it...

I suggest you instead look at your mail config, verifying that mail keeps on 
flowing when clamav happens to be down/unresponsive.

Unless you want to err on the safe side, and have a policy in place that says 
"we do not want to receive/send ANY mail when the virus scanning doesn't work". 
In that case, your system is already working as designed, and tonight's outage 
was actually helpful, because it prevented mail from getting through that could 
have been detected by a newer version of the database.

On the other hand, since you haven't updated ClamAV in over a year, leading to 
(significantly) decreased detection, maybe the scanning of email isn't top 
priority, and your mail scanning engine needs to fallback to letting mail 
through on scan errors.

-- 
Jan-Pieter Cornet <joh...@xs4all.nl>
"People are continuously reinventing the flat tyre".




_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to