> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:27:54PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas said: > > I'm working on code that would prevent rejecting some kinds of signarures at > > SMTP level. For example, phishing reports sent to abuse@ contact should > > pass, even if they contain phishing signatures. > > > > Now I'm curious which patterns to exclude from rejecting: > > > > I'm sure about "Phishing" in signature name but what about "Suspect" ? > > And are there any others I should count with? > > > > I'm not using any 3rd party signatures yet. > > > > ...I know that I can turn off phishing detection using PhishingSignatures > > and/or PhishingScanURLs directives, but that's not what I want.
On 11.05.10 22:35, Stephen Gran wrote: > Why not do selective rejects in your MTA based on the name of the > signature matched? The Phish ones and so on all follow a regular > pattern. Taht's precisely what I want to do. I'm searching which patterns I should accept here. I don't want to receive viruses, but I'm willing to receive phishing reports there. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Where do you want to go to die?" [Microsoft] _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
