2010/4/26 Török Edwin <edwinto...@gmail.com> > On 04/26/2010 11:14 PM, nicolas dumont wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've disabled the llvm for the libclamav compilation in order to reduce > the > > size of the lib. > > > > I've read the .pdf bytecode user's manual, and I would like to know if > the > > bytecode is only for users > > that want to make their own code for virus detection or would you add > some > > bytecode inside the database .cvd files > > in the main or in the daily that you provide ? > > There is a bytecode.cvd, and we'll start using it shortly. > > > > > I mean, by disabling the bytecode compiler, do I have the same behaviour > > than the 0.95.3 clamav version ? > > No, the bytecode *interpreter* is still there (bytecode_vm.c), it is > written in C, and runs the bytecodes... just slower than the JIT would. >
You mean that, even if I've disabled the llvm in my binary of 1MBytes : if I load the bytecode.cvd, my binary would be able to run the bytecodes and detect viruses with it ? but this will be done slower ? => slower for all scan of files then ? and more and more slower if bytecode.cvd size increase ? true ? > Best regards, > --Edwin > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml > _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
