> > This is not a matter of missing upgrades. This is a matter of > proactively > > breaking running systems. > > Exactly. They proactively broke the scanner so people would know why > it > broke, rather than letting it die with nothing more than an obscure > malformatted hexstring error.
Wasn't it better to simply let these system go the way they were used to? What's the difference from the clamav standpoint? _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
