On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Chuck Swiger <cswi...@mac.com> wrote: > Hi-- > > On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Royce Williams wrote: >>> On 04/08/2010 08:04 PM, Royce Williams wrote: >>>> First time poster, in a bind. We're running ClamAV 0.95.3 on FreeBSD >>>> 7.3. >>> >>> Does this still occur with 0.96? >> >> Not yet known. I'm unable to test it because I can't upgrade to 0.96. >> I think that this is because of the LLVM issue in bug 1934 reported >> by Chuck Swiger.
Heh - sorry for the extraneous 'T' at the end of your name. > If you're running FreeBSD 7.x, you should already have gcc-4.2.1 or > thereabouts with the base OS. Anyway, even the gcc-3.4.6 version from > FreeBSD-6.x seems to be doing OK with LLVM/JIT bytecode enabled once I > removed the two warning options which were not recognized by gcc-3. > > With regard to the failure you've described, what is output of "sysctl > vm.max_proc_mmap"? It could be the cause of ENOMEM from mmap(): > > [ENOMEM] MAP_FIXED was specified and the addr argument was not > available. MAP_ANON was specified and insufficient > memory was available. The system has reached the per- > process mmap limit specified in the vm.max_proc_mmap > sysctl. I am not familiar enough with the function of this sysctl to interpret the results. # sysctl vm.max_proc_mmap vm.max_proc_mmap: 78951 Royce _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
