On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 07:07:53PM +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > > >> > >> Then I decided SaneSecurity is not worth it, as > >> SpamAssassin catches those too, and has less false > >> positives. > >> > >> SaneSecurity triggers way too often when some dumb user > >> pastes a spam into his mail, or some robot sends a > >> bounce with an attachment. I do not want to report those > >> cases to SpamCop, Razor, DCC.. Making me writing tons of > >> tests in my scripts. Too risky. > > > > > > If someone pasts a spam into their mail it is not a false > > positive. It is a post that is indistinguishable from > > spam. There are consequences for that. > > > > Debatable. Anyway, I do not want to punish from that kind of a mistake. > I'm not an email nazi, while I indeed am a spam fighter.
Ehm, were you scoring SaneSecurity hits like one is supposed to, or just plain rejecting with them? Sounds like the latter. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
