Giampaolo

If you want some extra coverage you might try the signatures at http://sanesecurity.com. Besides all the great rules there, our winnow signatures, which are included, detect malware not yet in clamav as well as urls to malware. Current direct signatures are mapped to other AV systems at http://www.oitc.com/winnow/clamsigs/MalwareSignatures.html

Samples can be sent to virus-samples at oitc.com

Tom

At 10:55 PM +0200 9/15/09, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
 > The answer is very simply, resources.

 The submission interface receives around 20,000 unique samples a day,
 which
 exceeds the number of signatures that can be produced in a day by the
 sigmakers.   This forces us to prioritize by what we are seeing the
 most of
 in a given time period, as those are most likely the prevalent threats.

 If you, or anyone else in the ClamAV community is interested in writing
 signatures to help improve some of the response times feel free to
 contact
 me off list.

 Cheers
 -matt

Concise and clear.

Matt, thank you very much: this wipes my doubts about submission policies
and the like.

Giampaolo


 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni <
 giampa...@tomassoni.biz> wrote:

 > Hi,
 >
 > I occasionally submit virus samples to ClamAV through the official
 > submission page.
 >
 > Before submission I also check these viruses with VirusTotal, where
 at
 > least
 > a bunch of AV products do often detect my samples as malware.
 >
 > If this happens, I also add a link to the VirusTotal's analysis page
 > regarding the sample I'm submitting in the "Enter a short description
 of
 > the
 > virus" field of the submission form.
 >
 > This was used to work, and soon or later I was used to be notified of
 the
 > inclusion in the ClamAV database of a new detection pattern suitable
 for my
 > sample.
 >
 > It is months, however, that I don't receive notifications anymore
 regarding
 > my submissions. Also, it seems to me that recently submissions are
 quite
 > ignored. In example, in September 9 I reported to ClamAV a malware
 which is
 > still not recognized, while it is by 30 out of 41 AV products in
 > VirusTotal...
 >
 > See:
 >
 >
 http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/716704eb975160cf84c110e6510bb45ce983
 7a774
 > dcdee6136867b4c03f4981e-
 1252908923<http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/716704eb975160cf84c110e65
 10bb45ce9837a774%0Adcdee6136867b4c03f4981e-1252908923>.
 >
 > Anybody could explain what's going on with submissions? I can't find
 any
 > reliable reference to changes in the submission policies or the like.
 I
 > could only find this thread from this ML
 >
 >
 http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20081025.142726.40535408.en.html
 >
 > in which basically Bräckelmann is trying to figure out the same I am.
 But
 > no
 > reply to his question...
 >
 > Thank you,
 >
 > Giampaolo
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
 http://wiki.clamav.net
 > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
 >



 --
 Matthew Watchinski
 Sr. Director Vulnerability Research Team (VRT)
 Sourcefire, Inc.
 Office: 410-423-1928
 http://vrt-sourcefire.blogspot.com && http://www.snort.org/vrt/
 _______________________________________________
 Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
 http://wiki.clamav.net
 http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml


_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to