Sorry, I didn't want to install this on a production server, which first showed this problem, but the other two servers I installed clamav-0.95rc2 didn't exhibit this issue. Opened bug ID 1510.
Thank you, Frank >On Wed Mar 25 2009 23:31:39 GMT+0100 (CET) >fchan <fc...@molsci.org> wrote: >> I installed clamav 0.95 on a RHEL 5.1 running linux >> 2.6.18-128.1.1.el5xen and I was doing freshclam -v and noticed there >> is missing information: >> >> [fc...@s1 fchan]# freshclam -v >> ClamAV update process started at Wed Mar 25 15:21:15 2009 >> main.cld is up to date (version: 50, sigs: 500667, f-level: 38, >>builder: sven) >> daily.cld is up to date (version: 9168, sigs: 33870, f-level: 41, >>builder: neo) >> >> Normally it should look like this from my other system: >> >> [fc...@s3 fchan]# freshclam -v >> Current working dir is /var/lib/clamav >> Max retries == 5 >> ClamAV update process started at Wed Mar 25 15:27:48 2009 >> Using IPv6 aware code >> Querying current.cvd.clamav.net >> TTL: 793 >> Software version from DNS: 0.95 >> main.cvd version from DNS: 50 >> main.cld is up to date (version: 50, sigs: 500667, f-level: 38, >>builder: sven) >> daily.cvd version from DNS: 9168 >> daily.cld is up to date (version: 9168, sigs: 33870, f-level: 41, >>builder: neo) >> >> What happened? > >We didn't notice this problem and no one reported it for release >candidates... that's exactly what happened :-) > >Please open a bug report at http://bugs.clamav.net so we can fix the >verbose mode in the next release. > >-- > oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <tk...@clamav.net> > (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg > \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B > //\ /\ Wed Mar 25 23:52:19 CET 2009 >_______________________________________________ >Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net >http://www.clamav.net/support/ml _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
