At 8:35 PM +0100 3/19/09, Julio Canto wrote: >Sarocet escribió: >> Julio Canto wrote: >>> Paul Whelan escribió: >>> >>>> must be the clamwin version then >>>><http://www.clamwin.com/> which is a strange >>>>'official >>>> channel'. >>>> >>> Hi again, >>> You're wrong assuming that, therefore you should not accuse us of using >>> 'strange official channels'. All engines and parameters used - including >>> the ones from ClamAV - at VirusTotal are decided and provided with the >>> vendors involved >> The wording doesn't seem to "En el caso de ClamAV se ha optado por >> ClamWin Free Antivirus". It looks like an >> internal decision to use ClamWin, not that the ClamAV developers >> recommended it. > >It was a naming error, mostly because of some initial 'chaos' because >the lack of a single point of consulting regarding this matters. The >version we've been using the last years is the one that is sent to us by >ClamAV official development team.
Julio You are about to be one major rev behind (and are currently 1 minor rev behind). I would reco that you and ClamAV people get together and update / configure for performance Tom _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
