Bill Landry wrote: > Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> It doesn't matter - I use rsync in these situations because all moves are >> atomic, all the time. >> >> I have a mail server farm that includes production and dev systems, and NFS >> is >> used to access a large ZFS file system to redistribute this stuff. >> >> There is another reason to use rsync even within a file system - when you >> use >> rsync to dl files from the internet it is a big advantage to preserve the >> previous version as you then only exchange the changed records (Sane >> Security, >> for example). Particularly if you are moving text files that change only at >> the >> end of the file (unsorted). If I were to do a move I'd not have that >> advantage >> unless I made a copy and moved it and don't you think that's going a bit far? > > Well, I guess that would save one minuscule step in the process. > However, you claimed to have everything scripted and timed via cron, so > why would there ever be any file contention issues that would "require" > local rsyncing of files?
I don't know when clamd will self-check. Do you? dp _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
