On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:01:08 -0500 "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a goal for all software, especially security-related software, > should be to compile without warnings. (I know this can be annoying at > times, but it's worth it... when you do see a warning, you can react to it > instead of ignoring it because it's lost in the other 215 warnings.) We agree with this and almost all of the warnings have been already addressed in SVN: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273 The fixes were cosmetic, that's why they haven't been backported into 0.94.2. Thanks, -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Thu Nov 27 18:20:02 CET 2008 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
