On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:45:02 +0100
Luca Gibelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I examined the clamd.log that you sent me via private email and noticed
>that you are using some third party sig. databases, including MSRBL:
>
>MSRBL-Images/0-0-wxYz.UNOFFICIAL FOUND
>
>This signature is causing a permanent failure because it doesn't follow
>our naming standard: slashes are not allowed in signature names
>(although the engine accepts them).
>
>We should probably contact MSRBL and ask them to modify their naming
>scheme.
>
>Best regards

Just my personal opinion, but since the MSRBL signatures are using an
established method of naming definition files, and since ClamAV
does accept them for use with their Clamav engine, wouldn't it make
more sense to modify ClamAV's new reporting function to properly
allow signatures with '/' included in their name. On another note, I
also use the MSRBL signatures and have not noticed a problem yet. I
guess I will have to more thoroughly check out the log files.

Just my 2ยข.

-- 
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

San Francisco isn't what it used to be, and it never was.

        Herb Caen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to