Gregory Carter wrote: > I totally agree, but I think after you pointed out 4(a), all the other > issues cited simply makes further discussion pedantic.
Well, I'd like to add a remark. The discussion about all these issues isn't pedantic, as long as... ...all of us have in mind that the goal of pointing out and discussing all these points is to improve the quality of the tool, not to prove that the tool is bad. So thanks to all guys involved in ClamAV developpement. JM > > -gc > > Paul Kosinski wrote: ... _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
