Luis Miguel R. wrote: > El Monday, 24 December del 2007 a las 10:55:51AM, Dennis Peterson escribió: >> Paul Kosinski wrote: >>> In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still >>> a fair number of "real" viruses being detected in inbound email. Now >>> running 0.91.2 and 0.92, there seem to be only phishing attempts, and >>> not even very many of them. In fact it seems that our log file shows >>> almost as many (hourly) signature update messages as phish detections >>> (much less "real" virus detections). >>> >>> Have other ClamAV users experienced a similar decline in email >>> attacks? > > Yes. > > And this can be considered "bad news" for clamav integrators :).
Most of the viruses that I used to get are blocked by my bad-attachment-filename blocker. Block the really inappropriate stuff (.exe, .com, .bat, .pif, and a list of about 20-30 others), and the number of viruses that trickle through to clamav is amazingly small. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
