Steven Stern wrote: > Fabio Pedretti wrote: > >> I just upgraded my servers after a little testing: 0.92 seems to be about >> 20% faster than 0.91.2 and about 15% faster than 0.92rc2. >> The initial memory usage seems to be a little improved also (from 36m to >> 35m). >> >> Remains, however, the problem of icreased memory usage after DB reload: >> >> This is my "top" output after launching clamd but before DB reload: >> >> 16100 vscan 9 0 36484 35m 1080 S 0.0 1.8 0:02.90 clamd >> 16408 vscan 9 0 36484 35m 1080 S 0.0 1.8 0:00.02 clamd >> >> After bout 1800s there is the DB self checking (note that I'm also using >> sanesecurity signatures so the over 190k signatures): >> >> Tue Dec 18 17:18:37 2007 -> No stats for Database check - forcing reload >> Tue Dec 18 17:18:37 2007 -> Reading databases from /usr/local/share/clamav >> Tue Dec 18 17:18:39 2007 -> Database correctly reloaded (190744 signatures) >> >> And this is the "top" output just a second after the DB reload: >> >> 16100 vscan 9 0 70408 68m 1088 S 0.0 3.4 0:05.05 clamd >> 16408 vscan 8 0 70408 68m 1088 S 0.0 3.4 0:00.02 clamd >> >> > > I'm looking at clamd using 93m (res) and 151m (virt) after running for > about an hour, using the standard signatures. > On a fresh start, it's 47m (res) and 81m (virt). > After 3 1/2 hours
2332 clamav 20 0 216m 83m 1636 S 0 4.1 0:21.52 clamd It does seem to be growing _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
