--On 15 November 2007 10:07:22 +0100 Jan-Pieter Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

>
> If we do stop using clamav, it'll be because of the surprises we find
> after the next upgrade, or the upgrade after that. As I explained above,
> please keep the default scanner reliable (in terms of FPs).

Hmm...

Well, I'd agree that the default scanner should not produce significant 
false positives. However, the chances of producing a false positive don't 
lie entirely within the software. They lie in the behaviour of the software 
in your environment (mainly the type of traffic through your server).

Since environments differ, there's a trade-off here between providing good 
protection for a variety of users and limiting the damage done by false 
positives. Oh, and usability is an issue, too.

Now, I'd expect a manager of an ISP's mail service to be able to spend half 
an hour or so checking the configuration before deploying an upgrade. That 
time will be recovered if a single support incident is avoided, so it's a 
useful investment.

I would not expect surprises in the configuration deployed (whether it's 
the default or not) to result in abandonment of the software - especially 
if that the documentation in the configuration file makes it reasonably 
clear what can be expected.

If the documentation is sufficiently faulty, that might be a reason to 
abandon the software. However, given that this is open source, you might 
think along these lines: "Heck, that was bad, but I can fix it. Imagine how 
bad this would be if the problem happened in closed software!"

Can't happen? I remember a commercial AV product screwing up Macs by 
removing heuristically detected "trojans" that turned out to be part of the 
OS! Given that there were no actual trojans in the wild at all, we stopped 
paying our license fees for that product.

Oh, but wait. What's going on here? You upgrade ClamAV and your 
configuration changes? That shouldn't happen at all. Are you using an 
installer tool that overwrites your deployed configuration? Surely not!

-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to