John Rudd wrote: > It has a dangerous (lack of) value for CL_SCAN_STDOPT. You're better > off not upgrading until they fix it.
Is this a pet peeve, ravings of crack addled pomeranian, or real problem most of us will experience? Under what conditions would we expect dangerous failures? How will we recognize them? Describe the environment that will expose the danger. To be taken seriously (and I don't doubt for a moment your claim), you need to provide more than a drive-by rant. dp _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
