At 06:29 AM 6/2/2007, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:07:26 +0500
>Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > and... Broken update is not good, but core dumping of clamd is very bad.
> > It would be good to make clamd steadier with broken updates...
>
>First of all, the update itself was OK. Secondly, it's not possible to predict
>software crashes on XX platforms at various conditions. And lastly, we're
>talking about an _experimental_ code and using it (0.91rc1 or
>--enable-experimental in 0.90.x) one should be prepared for such
>inconveniences.
>
>Also what's worth mentioning here is that no-one reported this bug to our
>bugzilla so far!

Thank you.  I was trying to verify if it was just me or if others had 
this problem in prerelease/experimental code before screaming BUG!

I have submitted bug report #532.  Please ask for any additional 
required information.

It might be helpful if others who reported problems in this thread 
report what OS they are using so the developers can tell if this is 
isolated to FreeBSD.


-- 
Noel Jones 

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to