On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:40:48 +0200 Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:43 +0200 > Urban Hillebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We noticed as well the long delay with clamscan (several people have > > reported this here). We are perfectly ok with using clamd + clamdscan - > > however, on our mailgateways clamscan is still there as fallback if clamd > > is not responding (due to a crash or a misconfiguration). > > > > With the newly introduced delays during the initialization of clamscan > > this would cause us significant problems. So my question is: Will this get > > fixed, or is this "working as expected"? > > We're aware of the problem and it will be fixed in 0.91. It should be fixed now in SVN: Mon Apr 30 15:24:28 CEST 2007 (tk) ---------------------------------- * libclamav: use BM matcher to handle .mdb sigs -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Mon Apr 30 15:29:41 CEST 2007 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
