Jason Frisvold wrote: > On 4/11/07, John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Depends on what your goals are. >> >> For me, a reliable email system does not just mean "mail gets >> delivered". It also means that "we reliably reject detectable viruses". >> If we're letting viruses through because our pants are down (because >> our AV tool has failed), then that's not a reliable email system. >> That's a dysfunctional email system. > > Agreed... > >> better monitoring and notification: yes, good. > > Check out argus (http://argus.tcp4me.com) .. Works wonderfully for me. > >> It's like using condoms. Just because you run out of condoms doesn't >> make unprotected sex suddenly "safe". Accepting email from the world >> without your AV tool processing it is as irresponsible as having >> unprotected sex with the entire world. > > Ugh.. Thanks.. I'm gonna have nightmares for weeks now.. >
nightmares? hah to some that is their dream! ;) -Jim _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
