On 3/15/07 8:33 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Dana Kashubeck wrote:
On 3/15/07 7:04 PM, John Rudd wrote:
Seems like, from reading this list, so far ClamAV 0.90.* is pretty much a disaster. I don't think I'm aware of anyone having a smooth experience with it.
Yeah, those were my thoughts, too.  On the other hand, people who are 
having problems are much more likely to post than people without any 
problems.  I was just hoping there was someone else compiling on 
Panther and knew better than I how to resolve the issues.
I wouldn't disagree with either of the assessments above, but I'm also 
quite sure that I've gotten more value from ClamAV than I've spent in 
terms of either time or money.  ClamAV doesn't have to be perfect to 
still be quite useful, even if 0.88.x seems to be more stable than the 
0.90.x releases have been thus far.
Completely agree. Up until now it has been about a 2-minute upgrade process. This was the first time I had any trouble at all compiling and installing. Plus, it is no biggie because 0.88.7 is still chugging along just fine.
If you find a solution, please let me know. I'll post if I find it. Thanks!
The Fink project appears to have a 0.90.1 package for 10.3 available here:

  http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/clamav

Even if you don't want to install Fink, perhaps pinging the maintainer about the issues you've seen or looking for any patches made for the 10.3 environment might result in some useful clues....
I'll give it a look -- thanks!

--
-------------------------------------
Dana Kashubeck
Systems Manager
Riemer Reporting Service Inc.
http://www.riemer.com

Phone: 440-835-2477 x. 125
Fax:   440-835-4594
-------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to