-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 08:49:14AM -0500, Edward Dam wrote:
>Thanks again for all your help. Maybe once clamAV matures, it will be a >better fit for my needs, but until then I need to remove it, as it's the >cause of my headaches. I would disagree on the "it's not mature" inference. We use it on a load balanced system with each mail server handling 60K messages per day (CentOS 4.4) and have never had clamd die. There are another 200K or so a day that get rejected due to various RBL's but clamav/spamassassin never see those because it's blocked at HELO time. Occassionally spamass-milter wants to get hung in a weird state, but clamd and clamav-milter are rock solid (we're a sendmail shop by the way). However, since it is on a pretty busy machine, if moving your virus scanning off that busy machine fixes your problem, then you are doing the right thing for your needs. Congrats on not having to use Exchange! - -- Regards... Todd Exponential problems need logarithmic solutions. --Eddy Dreger Linux kernel 2.6.17-5mdv 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.00 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFrj72Y2VBGxIDMLwRAi5DAJ9x8HA1OZ35hlLIa53dBnBxGjgAkwCfbaUw ntG/IZPWv6Z94ryJpF27XNA= =Cgk+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
