-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Rudd wrote: > Sander Holthaus wrote: > >> A tempfail is not a disaster in most scenarios. You may not be >> able to receive mail until it is fixed, but you still get the >> mail after it is fixed. > > I think that attitude works fine in trivially small email > environments. > > I don't think it works at all in environments where you've got an > enterprise email system in a mission critical environment, where > having an email delayed significantly can have financial > implications. > A mission critial envirorement where having an email delayed significantly can have financial implications will not rely on one single virusscanner, but has two or three backups and never needs to throw a hard or tempfail when just clamav fails. And they are likely to employ much more scrutiny in using and updating non-standard db's.
Kind Regards, Sander Holthaus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) iD8DBQFFlu8wVf373DysOTURAkVrAKCPzIIwb8UTlW66C1VNSvEcwsxkugCgqFLv FLWEDwWlX/ZTNx8H6Kb/XaE= =9MQs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
