On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, JamesDR wrote: > ...if your users are being let down by the 'time it takes to get a phish > sig' then isn't about time their network/mail admin looked into added > levels of detection?
I think the original point was that if Clam is going to scan for phishing at all, the response time might be too slow to be useful, given the frequency with which the content changes. I haven't looked at our data closely enough to say whether or not this is true for our site, but it seems like it's worth looking into. Jeffrey Moskot System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
