Dennis Peterson wrote: > I'm not aware of any systems that have been disabled or rendered > useless be even the most aggressive phishing scheme.
Nor am I. > The best defense against phishing is and has always been education, > fwiw. Doesn't that apply to virus too? > Given the ease with which these can be defeated with other simple > tools available to any good messaging server I could do with a couple of pointers (for server-based use). > I don't mind they are given lower priority than correcting code > errors, improving documentation, discovering and responding to truly > destructive outbreaks, etc. As a matter of principle, maintaining the database of what ClamAV is supposed to detect must have the highest priority, IMHO. If not, everything else is pointless. /Per Jessen, Zürich _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
