On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 at 14:59:24 +0800, zamri wrote: > On 11/16/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 at 11:33:23 +0800, zamri wrote: > >> > >> That file was detected as worm for clamav 0.88.5. I think this is > >> sufficient to prove that 0.90rc2 was not able to detect it and I > >> presume 0.90rc2 virus db wasn't updated simultaneously as 0.88.5/6. > > > >There are no separated versions of virus db for 0.90rc and for 0.8x. > > > So u think i found a 'bug'?
We won't know unless we get the said file and know the details. Please read http://www.clamav.net/bugs.html#pagestart so that you can submit the bugreport (with the sample). -- Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only tomek at lodz.tpsa.pl http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/iso/ | ones and zeros. tomek at clamav.net http://www.ClamAV.net/ A GPL virus scanner _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html