On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 at 14:59:24 +0800, zamri wrote:
> On 11/16/06, Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 at 11:33:23 +0800, zamri wrote:
> >>
> >> That file was detected as worm for clamav 0.88.5. I think this is
> >> sufficient to prove that 0.90rc2 was not able to detect it and I
> >> presume 0.90rc2 virus db wasn't updated simultaneously as 0.88.5/6.
> >
> >There are no separated versions of virus db for 0.90rc and for 0.8x.
> >
> So u think i found a 'bug'?

We won't know unless we get the said file and know the details.

Please read  http://www.clamav.net/bugs.html#pagestart  so that you can 
submit the bugreport (with the sample).

-- 
 Tomasz Papszun    SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland    | And it's only
 tomek at lodz.tpsa.pl http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/iso/ | ones and zeros.
 tomek at clamav.net   http://www.ClamAV.net/   A GPL virus scanner
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to