Matthew Dettinger wrote: > So ultimately clamscan.exe will not take stdin. I will just have to run it > like you state above... multiple time! By reloading clamscan.exe in and out > of memory for every file at which point am I better off just scanning the > entire drive recursively?
Yes, Clam(D)Scan won't take more than one file from stdin. If you can't run the ClamD daemon and scan the files by using ClamDscan for some reason it would eventually be better to scan the entire drive, depending on the number of files to scan as was pointed out previously. Best regards, Nico -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
