Dirk Nissen wrote:
I am shure that I am missing something but if I use clamscan to scan my
disks it takes too mutch time (and CPU), and often I have to kill the
program.

You perhaps should try to use clamdscan instead.

I can understand clamscan would be very usefull on a mail gateway, for
scanning the mail inbox or for scanning external media when they are
mounted, but I didn't find a pratical way to regulary scan things as the
Windows partitions on a computer.

Is there some (graphical) frontend that I should use and that would limit
the number of files scanned?

There's http://www.clamwin.com/ ...?

I don't know how commercial products work. Do they really scan all files
on a computer everytime or do they remember the ones they scanned
allready?

Most can do both.

It seems to take about 30-50 minutes to scan a 40GB ATA disk on, say 1GHz P3 hardware if you do a full scan with the standard Windows products (Trend Micro, Symantec, Panda).

[ ... ]
However this would not work if a virus can change files without changing
the modification date and the filelength, and would only infect old
files... or if a virus can change the database of scanned files./

Yeah, you've identified the problem with assuming files which claim to be old aren't possibly virusized.

In fact, it's very common for a virus or rootkit to exact a compressed archive containing files which look like normal system files as far as possible, although the sloppier ones don't bother.

Is there some script/program that does something like this? What should I read?

You could check the list archives for the "find" command I just posted.

--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to