On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 at 12:25:29 -0800, Todd Lyons wrote: [...] > OT: > [...] > Do you find that bl causes a large reduction in spam? Speaking from a > biased point of view (because I'm getting blocked :-) that blacklist is > not a very good one. Here's where we go for definitive info and we > ignore Blars and five-ten-sg: > http://openrbl.org/client/#216.35.188.120
Some time ago I've made some evaluation of RBLs for my purposes and I've seen blackholes.five-ten-sg.com has too high false positive rate to being usable. -- Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only tomek at lodz.tpsa.pl http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/iso/ | ones and zeros. tomek at clamav.net http://www.ClamAV.net/ A GPL virus scanner _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
