On Friday 06 January 2006 09:55, Steven Spence wrote: > Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > > On Friday 06 January 2006 02:24, Michael wrote: > >>Ok, > >>your massages convinced me only to report the sender. > >>I don't want only blackhole the message and nothing else, because i think > >>one of the both, the sender or the recipient should get informed. > > > > no > > > > you should NEVER notify the sender. > > I wouldn't say never. If you had authenticated SMTP set up you could > always send the notification back to the sender using the username > supplied during the SMTP authentication process. After authentication > has succedeed of course. :)
rejecting the message should alert the user that something is wrong. Most MUAs will say "hey! they didn't take my mail!" and only outlook won't tell you why. 5xx Message rejected because of infection with Worm.YouSuck.Loser -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob.
pgpRMpq2dZ7cu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
