Michael said: > Ok, > your massages convinced me only to report the sender. > I don't want only blackhole the message and nothing else, because i think > one of the both, the sender or the recipient should get informed.
Since there is no way to know who the sender is, and since the recipient is not likely interested in messages telling them they didn't get a message because it had a virus, why not send the rejection message to Cindy Sheehan who seems to crave attention. Or better yet, just don't send anything at all. There is no point. If you cannot reject it before the final .crlfcrlf then you keep it. It's dead. Pinin' for the fjords, bleeding demised, an ex-message, shuffled off it's mortal coil, lovely plumage and all. dp... with thanks to Monty Python _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
