On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:32:57PM +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
> I truly believe that message describing reasons of such e-mail
> rejection is far better than discarding messages sent to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> silently.
Agreed. It is however pretty stupid to block "abusive" content
to an abuse@ address.
> (and if rfc-ignorant would have wider recognition around the world,
> such listings would lead simply to worldwide conversion of abuse@ into
> blackholes)
Fortunately, nobody in his right mind uses rfc-ignorant as a basis
to block emails, these days. Not if you care about receiving wanted
emails, that is.
--
#!perl -wpl # mmfppfmpmmpp mmpffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
$p=3-2*/[^\W\dmpf_]/i;s.[a-z]{$p}.vec($f=join('',$p-1?chr(sub{$_[0]*9+$_[1]*3+
$_[2]}->(map{/p|f/i+/f/i}split//,$&)+97):qw(m p f)[map{((ord$&)%32-1)/$_%3}(9,
3,1)]),5,1)='`'lt$&;$f.eig; # Jan-Pieter Cornet
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
