On Friday 14 October 2005 06:57 am, Nigel Horne wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 14:47, LECOMTE Régis wrote: > > This message (and any potential attachments) is confidential and may also > > be privileged. > > So why send it to a public mailing list?
because apparently the list is privileged. > > It is intended solely for the addresses. > > Without access to the list of subscribers here, how do you propose to > implement this. well, technically the list was the recipient of the message, so the list should have destroyed it before sending it out. It instead violated the agreement by forwarding it off to several hundred (thousand?) people :) It is a bad list and should be punished! > > If you are not the > > intended recipient please notify us immediately by calling + 33 (0)1 44 > > 53 46 00 > > Why should I make an international phone call if it's your mistake? it's not international if you live in france :) > > and destroy all copies > > I see no reason to comply with this instruction. actually, the reason to comply with it is simply because they told you to. Then when they ask you why you didn't respond, you simply say "oh, you told me to destroy it" :) > > . Any unauthorised use or dissemination is > > prohibited. > > Who says so? I do! You didn't destroy this message, I have already notified the authorities. > > E-mails are exposed to the danger of alteration. > > Well d'uh of course, with the use of cryptographic signing (such as PGP, S/MIME, etc) you can confirm if a message has not been modified (assuming the private key didn't get leaked, and used) -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob.
pgpt2GA6r9lBc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
