When I click those links, my Watchguard 700 reports:

WatchGuard firewall: Response denied from 
http://208.254.57.135:80/activescan/as5free/motor.cab: Unsafe content type 
"application/octet-stream"



On 9/10/05, Christoph Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> BitFuzzy wrote:
> > Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> >
> >> * On 10/09/05 13:47 -0500, Pablo Chamorro C. wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I managed to deploy squid + havp + clamav for antivirus control of
> >>> web pages/files, and for my surprise this morning I found:
> >>>
> >>> 10/09/2005 13:08:36
> >>> http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/as5free/motor.cab Virus:
> >>> Sirius.Annihilator.272
> >>> 10/09/2005 13:09:22
> >>> http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/as5free/motor.cab Virus:
> >>> Sirius.Annihilator.272
> >>> 10/09/2005 13:10:09
> >>> http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/as5free/motor.cab Virus:
> >>> Sirius.Annihilator.272
> >>> 10/09/2005 13:15:06
> >>> http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/as5free/motor.cab Virus:
> >>> Sirius.Annihilator.272
> >>>
> >>> Some comment?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ClamAv is right about the virus! At least it tells me the same when I
> >> try to download that file. Funnily, I use DansGuardian, not HAVP. We
> >> get the same results. So if anyting is 'wrong', it is clamav.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > The file scan'd fine with PcCillin as well.
> >
> > However, after sending test emails containing the contents of the .cab I
> > was able to identify "pskavs.dll" as being the file that's being tagged
> > as being infected.
> 
> The problem is that Panda still ships files that contain "plain
> viruscode", other vendors encrypt such files to avoid such false
> positives. So Clam is right somehow, it found the bytesequence of the
> virus in the file.
> 
> Not as an excuse but to prove the fact, i tested the file with some
> other scanners, and got the following:
> 
> Scanner 1: Win32:CTX
> Scanner 2: Frisk #2
> Scanner 3: W95/Sledge-A
> 
> So you can see it´s not only a problem of ClamAV. We have similar
> problems with some vulnerability scanners, that contain plain
> exploitcode - it wouldn´t be hard to encrypt the code....
> 
> However, i will include the file in my update.
> 
> Maybe you want to report the problem to Panda too - imho it´s a problem
> that can be solved by them - and be sure they know about it already - if
> they read the mails that people send to their support.
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Christoph mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
>
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to