Tomasz Kojm wrote: > Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > Michel Arboi wrote: [ omitted: > > > > Clamav does not even catch half of the worms that are currently in > > > > the wild. Most of them are dangerous IRC bots. ] > > > > I was about to ask how I can help the project. I will not. I think > > > > that you don't need "bad" people. > > > > > > > > Good bye. [ omitted: > > > > > > > > PS: you're distributing an outdated scanner, Im' not sure you are > > > > better than me. ] > > > > > > You're a troll. Go away! > > It's an insolence to cite me out of the real context.
Sorry for that. I should have used ellipses [...] to mark my omissions. It was not my intention to make it look like you declared him a troll because he said he would no longer want to contribute to the project. Instead, my intention was to express my astonishment over you not ignoring his trollish paragraph, but telling him to go away even though he stated he wanted to contribute. (Yes, not everybody knows how to do make valuable contributions, but most people are willing to learn.) > What can certainly be observed on this mailing list is a tendency to > attack and reproach the developers. It is probably best to simply ignore that. Even inexperienced people can learn to make valuable contributions. If you don't send them away, that is. > We don't need a help from people who distribute malware on their www > sites (and even fail to properly classify samples). That's exactly what I meant. Why not tell him "you should not distribute malware to the public" in a firm but friendly way instead of harhsly sending him away? Anyway, I don't want to keep this thread alive. I just wanted to point out that it may be wise to "be cautious in what you send, and liberal in what you tolerate".
pgpnnEOHdYMrb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
