Jim Popovitch said: > On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 09:28 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> > >> > To me, the original javascript IS a virus and SHOULD be reported by >> > clam(d)scan. >> > >> > -Jim P. >> >> If this is the case then adding the script to any content filter you run >> should be a minimum step while you're waiting for a Clamav solution. > > <argh>! That is not the reason I am posting to clamav. If I wanted to > block it myself, I would have (and have) long ago. The reason for the > post is to A) Alert others B) find out if others think this is > something that clamav guru's should be paying attention to. I agree with you - I'm just suggesting that any interested parties not sit by until that happens. I'm also glad I got a copy to use for a pattern filter - thanks for posting the link. > I can solve > the problem on my own, I just thought that this was something clamav > should be doing for the masses. I'll shutup now since it is all too > apparent that ppl think I came here to get individual assistance in > solving a problem rather than to identify a potential oversight in > clamav. It might be a good idea to bring it up on the developer's mail list. Don't give up. dp _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
