This error happened on RedHat enterprise Server 3.0
----- Original Message ----- From: "SPAMMER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:23 PM Subject: [Clamav-users] error in freshclam V0.85 Hi, I descovered an error in freshclam V0.85. It is installed on an SuSE SLES 8 SP1, UL 1.0 SP3 box. (Linux version 2.4.21-138-smp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.2.2) #1 SMP Fri Oct 31 00:51:31 UTC 2003) When I install from the sources and run "freshclam -v" the output stops after the main.cvd: ./freshclam -v Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav Max retries == 3 ClamAV update process started at Thu May 12 10:23:45 2005 SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES See the FAQ at http://www.clamav.net/faq.html for an explanation. Querying current.cvd.clamav.net TTL: 202 Software version from DNS: 0.85 main.cvd version from DNS: 31 main.cvd is up to date (version: 31, sigs: 33079, f-level: 4, builder: tkojm) So I used my very little knowledge of c-programming and insertet a Debug-Line just to print "Start" at line 158: ---snip--- memset(ipaddr, 0, sizeof(ipaddr)); mprintf("## 1 ##\n"); if((ret = downloaddb(DB1NAME, "main.cvd", hostname, ipaddr, &signo, copt, dnsreply, localip)) > 50) { ---snap--- I made a make clean and a make inside the freshclam directory of the sources and suprisingly the output is fine again ... "freshclam -v" prints now the following: ./freshclam -v Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav Max retries == 3 ClamAV update process started at Thu May 12 10:51:10 2005 SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES See the FAQ at http://www.clamav.net/faq.html for an explanation. Querying current.cvd.clamav.net TTL: 650 Software version from DNS: 0.85 Start main.cvd version from DNS: 31 main.cvd is up to date (version: 31, sigs: 33079, f-level: 4, builder: tkojm) daily.cvd version from DNS: 875 daily.cvd is up to date (version: 875, sigs: 1218, f-level: 4, builder: diego) Freeing option list...done I know that my added line has nothing to do with the whole functionality of the subroutine ... but it helps. I think it is the real programmer's job to discover the real reason :-) . Regards, bk _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
