On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:06:02 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote: > > Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > Probably more like: can we have 'technical-threats.cvd' and > > > 'non-technical-threats.cvd' instead of 'main.cvd'? > > > > You don't give up do you? ;-) > > Not until someone convincingly explains to me why my request for a > practical option to distinguish between technical and non-technical > threats (i.e. exploitation of technical flaws in software vs. > exploitation of end-user naiveté) is inappropriate. I'm not commenting on your correctness, merely on your staying power. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
