Julian Mehnle wanted us to know: >| To those of you who argue that ClamAV should detect phishing attacks >| even though tools like SpamAssassin are designed and inherently better
Perhaps marketing speak would better suit you. McAffee detects phishing emails. What better way to give *ALL* AV competitors a big weapon about "why you should not use ClamAV" than to disable those things that are "built-in protection" to the big commercial vendors. On the other hand, I do like the idea of seperate db's for seperate functions. It just seems very unixy. But at this point I fully stand behind the direction that the devs are taking clamav. -- Regards... Todd They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin Linux kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdkenterprise 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.06, 0.06 _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
